Editing C&I Wiki Portal/Criteria
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= | =DRAFT - WORK IN PROGRESS= | ||
'''Will go into effect 1 January 2016.''' | |||
==Terminology== | ==Terminology== | ||
Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
==OCP INSPIRED Product== | ==OCP INSPIRED Product== | ||
All OCP Inspired | All OCP Inspired Products must adhere to the following criteria, which are subject to Foundation staff, Incubation Committee leadership, and relevant Project Lead. | ||
A product may called OCP INSPIRED when the following two groups of criteria are met: | A product may called OCP INSPIRED when the following two groups of criteria are met: | ||
Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
The Product '''MUST''' meet at least one (1) of the three (3) the following criteria: | The Product '''MUST''' meet at least one (1) of the three (3) the following criteria: | ||
'''(1)''' The Product MUST fit into a 19 inch rack | '''(1)''' The Product MUST fit into a 19 inch rack or Open Rack. If a component (e.g. adapter, memory, processor, disk, etc.), it '''MUST''' fit inside a device designed for either of those racks. | ||
'''(2)''' The spec associated with the Product '''MUST''' be submitted '''AND''' acknowledged by the following individuals: | '''(2)''' The spec associated with the Product '''MUST''' be submitted '''AND''' acknowledged by the following individuals: | ||
Line 44: | Line 46: | ||
Products making the claim of compliance with an approved specification SHALL at a minimum, follow all requirements defined as mandatory by the use of the following keywords in that specification: SHALL - MUST - WILL - REQUIRED. Such products may also provide ''recommended'' features associated with the keyword “SHOULD” and ''permitted'' features associated with the keyword “MAY”. A product may called OCP ACCEPTED when the following two groups of criteria are met: | Products making the claim of compliance with an approved specification SHALL at a minimum, follow all requirements defined as mandatory by the use of the following keywords in that specification: SHALL - MUST - WILL - REQUIRED. Such products may also provide ''recommended'' features associated with the keyword “SHOULD” and ''permitted'' features associated with the keyword “MAY”. A product may called OCP ACCEPTED when the following two groups of criteria are met: | ||
OCP ACCEPTED GROUP 1 CRITERIA: | |||
ALL (6) of the following criteria are: | ALL (6) of the following criteria are: | ||
Line 53: | Line 55: | ||
*The submitter has completed a self-assessment AND attests that EACH SKU (orderable part number) meets the criteria. | *The submitter has completed a self-assessment AND attests that EACH SKU (orderable part number) meets the criteria. | ||
*Submitter / Requestor has sent the self-assessment documentation to the Foundation. | *Submitter / Requestor has sent the self-assessment documentation to the Foundation. | ||
*Submitter HAS provided the Foundation with the list of SKUs and | *Submitter HAS provided the Foundation with the list of SKUs and Orderable P/Ns and the documentation necessary for a re-assessment to be completed by the Foundation lab director or a 3rd Party designee, and the Foundation Staff. Acceptable documentation can be links to public information or documentation sent to the foundation. It is the submitter’s responsibility to provide ALL the documentation to prove that specification criteria is met. | ||
OCP ACCEPTED GROUP 2 CRITERIA: | |||
After a product has met OCP ACCEPTED GROUP 1 criteria | |||
* | *The FOUNDATION will list the SKUs and Orderable P/N’s and will publish this on the OCP web portal. | ||
At this point, the Submitter may use the term “OCP ACCEPTED” per OCP terms and conditions. | |||
OCP ACCEPTED NOTES | |||
If a product does NOT meet the criteria in the SPECIFICATION described as “SHALL” or “MUST”, the submitter is encouraged to contact the original SPECIFICATION author(s) with a list of differences and non-compliance. The author(s) MAY create a modification or revision to the SPECIFICATION that would allow the submitter’s product to be reconsidered. Alternatively, the submitter may author their own specification, get it approved by the | If a product does NOT meet the criteria in the SPECIFICATION described as “SHALL” or “MUST”, the submitter is encouraged to contact the original SPECIFICATION author(s) with a list of differences and non-compliance. The author(s) MAY create a modification or revision to the SPECIFICATION that would allow the submitter’s product to be reconsidered. Alternatively, the submitter may author their own specification, get it approved by the Incubation Committee, and submit their product against it. |