Editing C&I Wiki Portal/Criteria
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Products making the claim of compliance with an approved specification SHALL at a minimum, follow all requirements defined as mandatory by the use of the following keywords in that specification: SHALL - MUST - WILL - REQUIRED. Such products may also provide ''recommended'' features associated with the keyword “SHOULD” and ''permitted'' features associated with the keyword “MAY”. A product may called OCP ACCEPTED when the following two groups of criteria are met: | Products making the claim of compliance with an approved specification SHALL at a minimum, follow all requirements defined as mandatory by the use of the following keywords in that specification: SHALL - MUST - WILL - REQUIRED. Such products may also provide ''recommended'' features associated with the keyword “SHOULD” and ''permitted'' features associated with the keyword “MAY”. A product may called OCP ACCEPTED when the following two groups of criteria are met: | ||
OCP ACCEPTED GROUP 1 CRITERIA: | |||
ALL (6) of the following criteria are: | ALL (6) of the following criteria are: | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
*Submitter HAS provided the Foundation with the list of SKUs and orderable part numbers, and the documentation necessary for a re-assessment to be completed by the Foundation lab director or a 3rd Party designee, and the Foundation Staff. Acceptable documentation can be links to public information or documentation sent to the foundation. It is the submitter’s responsibility to provide ALL the documentation to prove that specification criteria is met. | *Submitter HAS provided the Foundation with the list of SKUs and orderable part numbers, and the documentation necessary for a re-assessment to be completed by the Foundation lab director or a 3rd Party designee, and the Foundation Staff. Acceptable documentation can be links to public information or documentation sent to the foundation. It is the submitter’s responsibility to provide ALL the documentation to prove that specification criteria is met. | ||
OCP ACCEPTED GROUP 2 CRITERIA: | |||
*After a product has met OCP ACCEPTED GROUP 1 criteria, the OCP Foundation will list the SKUs and orderable part numbers, published on the OCP web portal. | *After a product has met OCP ACCEPTED GROUP 1 criteria, the OCP Foundation will list the SKUs and orderable part numbers, published on the OCP web portal. | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
Upon publication on the OCP web portal, the Submitter may use the term “OCP ACCEPTED” per OCP terms and conditions. | Upon publication on the OCP web portal, the Submitter may use the term “OCP ACCEPTED” per OCP terms and conditions. | ||
OCP ACCEPTED NOTES | |||
If a product does NOT meet the criteria in the SPECIFICATION described as “SHALL” or “MUST”, the submitter is encouraged to contact the original SPECIFICATION author(s) with a list of differences and non-compliance. The author(s) MAY create a modification or revision to the SPECIFICATION that would allow the submitter’s product to be reconsidered. Alternatively, the submitter may author their own specification, get it approved by the | If a product does NOT meet the criteria in the SPECIFICATION described as “SHALL” or “MUST”, the submitter is encouraged to contact the original SPECIFICATION author(s) with a list of differences and non-compliance. The author(s) MAY create a modification or revision to the SPECIFICATION that would allow the submitter’s product to be reconsidered. Alternatively, the submitter may author their own specification, get it approved by the Incubation Committee, and submit their product against it. |